Civics 101

January 10, 2017 § Leave a comment

Outside the downtown criminal courts building in the early morning, an observer would be forgiven for thinking that the stream of 150 or so glum-looking adults reluctantly heading into the building were defendants arriving for sentencing.

Follow these same folks through security and up the elevator, however, and you’d land on the 11th floor, their destination being the northeast corner suite of the Juror Service Division of the California Superior Court. They are not the ones being judged; they are the judgers.

I joined this parade the fourth week of December. summons

Receiving a jury summons in the mail will cramp the stomach of even the most civic minded citizen. Suddenly, your future is one big question mark. Every appointment you agree to is prefaced with, “If I’m not on jury duty.”

The court has at least made things as convenient as possible. Registration and the 90 minute orientation can be completed online, resulting in a midmorning start time. You may not have to show up at all: You call their automated service every evening to see if they need you the next day. If you’re  called in but are not empaneled by the end of your day, you’re excused for another 12 months.

At the same time, the courts have made it more difficult NOT to serve. Not so long ago, you could return your summons with an excuse for not serving: I’m a teacher, I’m a student, my employer doesn’t pay me when I’m on a jury, etc. These days, unless you’re physically unable, don’t speak English, or on active duty military, you’ve got to show up. Once there, if empaneled—called to a courtroom with 20 to 40 others to be questioned about your fitness to serve as a juror for a specific case—you have to make your case for being excused in person.

I heard more than a few people grumbling about missing a day of school or work when they would most likely be excused from service by the judge. And yet, how else to ensure an accused person’s constitutional right (Article III, Sec. 2, Para. 3) to trial by jury?

I’ve responded four times to a jury summons and served on a jury once. I found it one of the most engaging and meaningful experiences of my life, and not just because we put a serial rapist back into custody where he could do no more harm (to women, anyway). I felt I was doing something vital. Our work really mattered to the defendant and his accuser.

badge We’ve all watched courtroom dramas on TV or the big screen. Who could forget the tension and dynamism of Twelve Angry Men? The action in real courtrooms, however, is both more dramatic and more mundane. Judges, defendants, attorneys and prosecutors all have their strengths and quirks that they enact right in front of you. There’s also the real-time boredom of waiting for lawyers and judge to settle procedural matters that arise.

Jury service is also quintessentially American. On one occasion when I was empaneled but ultimately not required to serve, the judge spent what I felt was an inordinate amount of time explaining our judicial system and the function of juries. Boring. Then I took a good look at the people gathered in the courtroom. Possibly half had not been born in the United States. Jury summonses go out to citizens in all sorts of occupations and with varying levels of education. So, yeah, the judge had to inoculate people with a dose of Civics 101.

The week before Christmas, I didn’t get as far as a courtroom, which was fortunate because the only group empaneled that day was for a four-week trial beginning in mid-January. As meaningful as I’ve found jury experience, four weeks of sitting in a windowless courtroom is more civic service than I’m prepared for.

How to save time. Literally.

December 13, 2016 § Leave a comment

Which would you rather have: more money? Or more time?

asntbOn the east side of L.A., many have chosen the latter by joining one of the 13 neighborhood outposts of the Arroyo SECO Network of Time Banks (ASNTB).

Financial resources may expand (or contract), but each of us has only so much time. Every sweep of the second hand or pulse of a digital watch moves us inexorably towards the end of our allotted time.

But a time bank literally helps you “save time.”

The savings come from having someone else do for you what you can’t do on your own. The price is fixed: one “time dollar” for every hour of work performed, paid from your own stash of hours earned by you through providing goods or services for other members of the time bank.

SLTBThe time dollar concept makes time banking different from bartered exchanges based on a quid pro quo. If you’ve earned a time dollar by showing someone how to program their TV remote, you can spend it by having another member put up shelves in your closet.

The range of services is limited only by members’ skills, their available time, and willingness to help out. You don’t even need to be flush with time dollars in order to participate: going into debt is okay—and interest free. Anyway, dollars are surprisingly easy to earn; your first deposit comes from showing up for the orientation required for all new members. Bring a dish to one of ASNTB’s periodic potlucks: another time dollar. Help the library with its book sale: more dollars.

You actually earn dividends on your time dollar deposits because when you circumvent the market economy, you’re working towards a human-scale sharing economy that honors our interdependence. In simpler terms, you’re building community and fostering collaboration.

These dividends aren’t by-products of time banking, but its raison d’être. Consider the Time Bank’s stated core values:

  • We are all assets. No one knows or does everything, and everyone knows and can do something.
  • Some work is valuable beyond market price— and that work needs to be recognized and rewarded.
  • Helping works better as a two-way street. The community we create offers a greater reward than simply the sum of the work done.
  • We need each other. Networks are stronger than individuals.
  • Every human being matters. Everybody has something to offer, and has unmet needs as well.

10620489_712581025523191_7015377712367517854_oASNTB is a project of Arroyo Sustainable Economies Community Organization, which oversees other community-building efforts including a revolving loan fund created to help individuals or cooperatives get their small businesses up and running.

electronic repair

ASNTB partners with other organizations for projects such as the Repair Cafe, which encourages people to give household items a second life by bringing them to a cadre of volunteers who gather bi-monthly (more or less) on a Saturday morning to fix or mend what is broken.

Time banking is an international phenomenon. ASNTB is an member of the California Federation of Time Banks, which in turn is part of a national coalition with international connections.

Ready to save some time? Here’s where to jump in: http://www.asntb.com

 

Good-bye grass, hello gravel

November 8, 2016 § Leave a comment

turf Remember when I wrote about a neighbor who was “unclear on the concept” of transitioning from a water-hog front yard of grass to one with low water-using plantings? (No? You can read about it here.)

My complaint was that the spread of gravel substituted for grass might have met the letter of the California Friendly® Landscape Incentive Program, but not its spirit. Granted, the new yard had a few drought-tolerant plants scattered about. They were hardly enough, however, to create the “friendly landscape” promoted by the Los Angeles Department of Water & Power and Metropolitan Water District. Those rocks would not convert CO2, a greenhouse gas, to user-friendly oxygen or be good at capturing rainwater. In fact, they would absorb heat and increase temperatures.

Turns out, I was on to something.

Bloomberg Businessweek recently featured an investigation into what the two water agencies got in return for their $428 million incentive program. The story focused on the work of a company called Turf Terminators that banked 12 percent, $44 million, of that pot o’ gold, the largest single share.

california-friendly-landscaping-image-englishTurf Terminators was created by a couple of 20-something entrepreneurs who jumped into the program just as the MWD raised its rebate from $1 to $2 a square foot in 2014. City residents can get an additional $1.75 from the LADWP for a juicy total of $3.75 for every square foot of lawn removed. The company’s pitch to homeowners was that in return for rights to whatever rebate was owed them, Turf Terminators would replace their lawns for free. And Turf Terminators would even handle the paperwork.

Technically, the company should not have been in the rebate game: Landscapers were required to be in business three years in order to participate. Turf Terminators solved this problem by buying out a contractor who’d been around for a while and, presto change-o, the subsidies began to flow.

Turf Terminators claimed that in less than two years, it removed 16 million square feet of grass from 12,000 lawns. Not everyone was happy with the results, however, and they vented on Yelp. This lament from a Porter Ranch homeowner was typical.

So here’s the deal: before you hire anyone to rip up your yard consider the implications of what that means. Your front yard will look like a crappy gravel parking lot or an abandoned drive-in theater. If your grass already looked bad then this just might be an improvement.

Not the case for me. My, once, lush beautiful green yard now looks like it’s only missing an abandoned car on blocks then the image would be complete.

Having a gravel yard hasn’t saved me any money. My LADWP bill is pretty much the same.

I can’t say for sure if my neighbor’s yard is a Turf Terminator creation, but it fits the profile: a few plants, a lot of gravel, and, over time, weeds poking up through a supposedly impermeable barrier. Customers also reported broken drip irrigator controls and plantings that failed to thrive, even after multiple replacements.

The MWD was well aware of these problems. Emails obtained by Businessweek through FOIA requests show that MWD staffers “griped about the slapdash nature of the of the [rebate] applications.” Lawn sizes looked inflated and photographs didn’t match what was at the listed address.

Staff also knew about the quality control issues. When a city councilman invited media outlets to observe Turf Terminators replacing his lawn, an MWD resource specialist took a look at photos of the new yard and compared the dense plantings there with a redone yard in her own neighborhood. “They obviously knew the job was at a council person’s, because it doesn’t look like any other project out there,” Businessweek quotes from her email to the program director.

ttIn May 2015, the MWD board met to consider whether to extend the program beyond its initial $88 million funding, which had been gobbled up in less than a year. During public comment period, community and environmental activists communicated their concerns about inappropriate landscaping. Their critique would be echoed a month later in an L.A. Times Op-Ed by noted landscape architect Mia Leher and colleagues. They said in part:

Gardens and lawns act as air conditioning for L.A., which is only getting hotter with climate change. Plants and trees provide shade and transpire moisture to cool the air; gravel and artificial turf don’t. In fact, they create the opposite of a virtuous cycle: Fewer plants means more heat, and more heat means faster evaporation from watering, swimming pools and vegetation. More heat also means more water to support the same landscape.

Yet the MWD board went ahead and committed an additional $340 million without any requirements on how lawns should be replaced or with what.

Just a few months later, in July 2015, all of the new money had been promised to applicants and MWD called a halt to the program. (The LADWP continues their incentive rebate of $1.75/square foot.)

The water district professes to be pleased with the outcome of their incentive program. They reckon a potential savings of 7.5 billion gallons of water per year. Yet as Leher and her colleagues  tried to tell the agency, calculating water savings is a complex business. They advocated instead “rainwater harvesting, gray water reuse and recycling water from sewage treatment plants” to reduce the use of potable water for watering. “Incentivizing turf removal and not reuse is shortsighted.”

A week after the MWD turned off the rebate spigot, Turf Terminators announced it would accept no new customers. The company completed jobs already “incentivized,” then laid off most of its 450 workers.

As criticisms of their work grew, the company subsequently hired a public relations firm that calls itself “a leader in crisis management of all types.” Businessweek’s request for an on-record interview with Turf Terminators principals was refused.

The men behind Turf Terminators have not exactly folded their tents and slipped away into the night. Rather they’ve formed a new company from the ashes of the old: a contractor services firm called Build Savings. Its website invites homeowners to hire Build Savings to install “money saving home upgrades. The LADWP provides rebates for some elements of such upgrades.

As evidence that their company was competent to do such work, an early iteration of the Build Savings website asserted it had successfully “completed 12,000 installations.”

Perhaps realizing that truth in advertising was warranted, that claim has been removed.

 

Noon to Midnight

October 4, 2016 § Leave a comment

noon to midnight

I’m not a scene-ster. I don’t go to rock shows that start at 10 p.m. I didn’t score tickets to Desert Trip (AKA OldChella). Although I’ve lived in Silverlake for more than two decades, I’ve never set foot in Spaceland. (Or the Echo for that matter.)

So I was surprised to find myself in the midst of such a scene at Walt Disney Concert Hall this past Saturday. Food trucks parked on Grand! Scads of people–mostly young–moving in, out and around WDCH! Beer tastings in the Cafe! Drums and pianos in the garden!

adams-175It was the LA Phil’s first-ever 12-hour celebration of New Music, Noon to Midnight, curated by the godfather of New Music, John Adams, the Phil’s “Creative Chair.” For a mere $15, you had eight hours to feast on great works of contemporary music played inside and out of Disney Hall by up-and-coming local groups like wild Up and Jacaranda  Then, beginning at 8, with a separate ticket to the LA Phil’s Green Umbrella concert, you got four world premiers conducted by Adams plus a wild Up after-concert concert of yet more premiers.

And then there were the crickets. From 9 to 11 p.m., a microphone amplified the sounds of 1,000 caged live crickets placed in the center of BP Hall, “calling to remembered landscapes that evoke the poetics and politics of place.”

The entire event was like that: immensely creative, a little wacky, brilliant, thought-provoking, annoying, and more.

Before giving a downbeat for the evening concert, John Adams took a microphone for some off-the-cuff remarks. When Green Umbrella concerts began in 1988, he said, New Music wasn’t even a blip on L.A.’s music horizon. Citing the number of youthful ensembles that had assembled themselves in L.A. over the past decade, he declared that New Music’s time had arrived. And it was happening here–not Brooklyn or San Francisco–in Los Angeles.

At which the unusually large audience applauded with enthusiasm, me included.

The Hundred-Year Walk

July 26, 2016 § Leave a comment

The Hundred Year WalkGrowing up in the 1950s, I would hear my mother say, as mothers are wont to do, “Don’t waste food. Think of the starving children in __________!”

India was usually the country named, though China occasionally received a nod. And then my mother would add, “In my day, it was starving Armenians.”

Until much later, I had no idea who Armenians were, where they lived, or why they were starving. Now I find myself living amongst the largest concentration of Armenian Americans outside of Russia—214,000 residents of Greater Los Angeles claim Armenian heritage— and next door to Glendale, where an estimated 40 percent of the population has Armenian roots.

I now know that Armenians were starving because during WW I, Turkish officials rounded up as many as 1.5 million Armenian citizens of the Ottoman Empire and either slaughtered them outright or force-marched them into desolate regions where they slowly succumbed to disease, malnutrition or exposure.

Dawn Anahid MacKeen, who grew up in Glendale’s Armenian diaspora, has written the astonishing account of one man who, against all odds, survived the genocide: her grandfather Stepan Miskjian. The Hundred-Year Walk, An Armenian Odyssey, was published earlier this year by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

portrait1930

Stepan Miskjian

It is a deeply personal tale, interwoven with her own story of how she came to learn the details of Stephan’s arduous journey, eventually retracing his route through Turkey and into the deserts of what is now Syria and Iraq.

Cliche though it is, I have to say that if Stephan’s life were made into a movie, no one would believe it.

For two years, he, along with hundreds of thousands of others, were herded further and further from population centers, always alert to opportunities to earn a bit of bread or a place in someone’s shelter. Stepan escaped what was to be the final death march by slipping away in the dark and walking six days through the desert with no food and only two cups of water.

It was a superhuman feat but not the end of Stepan’s trials. He was recaptured and had to escape again—not once but several times over. Eventually he found his way to the camp of a powerful Bedouin sheik who sheltered him until the Ottoman empire’s war effort collapsed and Stepan was able to make his way back to his hometown and remaining family members.

The Hundred-Year Walk is a richly detailed narrative, a visceral testimony to suffering that is not easily forgotten.

I now understand why my mother, born in 1910, would have been encouraged to “remember the starving Armenians.”

Here’s what puzzles me, though: If a little girl in far-off Altoona, Pennsylvania, knew about the calamity befalling Armenians, how is it that one hundred years later, the Turkish government and many of Turkey’s citizens still cannot see it for what it was: genocide?

365

July 5, 2016 § Leave a comment

365 logo  It’s been a while since anything has annoyed me as much as the new 365 store in Silver Lake.

Maybe I just don’t like 365’s parent company, Whole Foods Markets.

You’ve heard the common complaint, that the stores should be called “Whole Paycheck” because of the high prices.

But I’ve got a few more grievances:

  • John Mackey, a Whole Foods founder and current co-CEO, is an anti-union, libertarian jerk who felt so strongly about Obamacare that he wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed opposing it.
  • Mackey expanded Whole Foods by scooping up regional chains, e.g. Fresh Fields in No. Virginia and Mrs. Gooch’s in SoCal, to create a near monopoly on what we used to call health food stores. Independent stores, with clerks who knew you and their products, got pushed out of business.
  • Whole Foods masquerades as a health food store but is actually an up-scale big-box merchandizer selling gourmet products to a monied constituency.

good choices And now along comes 365, designed to cut costs by requiring only 100 employees to operate, as opposed to the typical Whole Foods Market that employs 250 to 500 workers. The preponderance of prepackaged produce and a DIY regimen for what isn’t—customers must weigh and tag their own, a task done by check-out clerks at Whole Foods Markets—also cut labor costs.

The company says prices at 365 are cheaper than at Whole Foods, but that’s more appearance than reality. The store brand—365—dominates inventory; shoppers looking for  high-priced specialty items won’t find them. A Los Angeles Times consumer review of five basics found 365’s priced about the same as Trader Joe’s.

good times  Whole Foods is gambling on the success of its 365 stores. According to the L.A. Times, full-sized Whole Food Markets open a year or more have shown three straight quarters of declining revenue; this year’s sales are flat. Shares are trading at less than half their $65 high in the fall of 2013. The company has announced its intention to open five more 365 locations in SoCal.

The company is upfront about banking on Millennials to pull them out of their hole. The stores employ technology Millennials have grown up with: iPads to place orders with the store kitchen and a wine section where you find reviews by scanning labels with a smartphone.

And then there’s the not-too-subtle marketing. The company ran three full-page ads targeting Millennials in the Times’ “Saturday” section just before opening day. They border on being parodies of themselves: good-looking young people, not all of them white and some of them tattooed, with phrases such as “good choices,” “good times,” “good vibes,” and “good things” liberally sprinkled about.

good vibesThe ads represent 365 as being a gift to this demographic, “Because we believe making good choices should be a lot less effing time consuming.”

Seriously, could they get any more effing annoying?

Dead ends

April 21, 2016 § Leave a comment

I can’t be the only one who grabs the California section of the L.A. Times each morning and races through to the obituaries.

In part it’s a response to aging: mortality seems so much more real than it did even 10 years ago. I check out ages of the deceased, do the calculations, think, “Okay, 94, that sounds good. Hmm, 83, I could accept that.” As if I actually could bargain for longevity.

Mostly, though, I read obituaries because they are mini-biographies, often fascinating glimpses into another’s otherwise private life. Written by a family member or friend, they attempt to sum up a life, say what made the person special. Not that that’s possible in 200 or so words, but those left behind try because that’s how we honor people we love.

There’s a certain predictability to many of the obituaries. Men are summed up through their careers, women by their families and volunteer work (unless they’re under 60, in which case careers also matter). In lieu of corporate success, hobbies, athletic accomplishments, travel, and pets’ names are mentioned.

Language, too, tends towards the conventional. The deceased has “gone home to the Lord.” They “bravely battled cancer” and “adored” their grandchildren. They were universally “loved and admired.” She/he married after meeting “the love of her/his life.” * It seems important to survivors to mention, when they can, that their loved one “died peacefully at home, surrounded by family,” which often leads to thanks and appreciation of the (usually Filipina or Latina female) caregivers who enabled the deceased to stay at home.

Even if spoken in platitudes, the stories these obituaries tell hint at interesting lives well lived. Folks arrive here from far-flung places: Skopje, Yugoslavia; Chuquicamata, Chile; County Donegal, Ireland; Tokyo, Japan, brought by parents or lured by jobs or relatives or the Golden State mythos.

I marveled at the man from Belfast, Ireland, for instance, who emigrated to the U.S. as a youth and served in the Air Force during WW II as navigator bombardier. He not only survived 30 missions over Germany but lived to be 100.

Occasionally, a good piece of writing appears, usually written by friends. A painter and print-maker was recently eulogized as “playful with his grandchildren and demanding of his students. He inspired all who knew him to expand their horizons and to accomplish more than they believed possible.”

More rare still are the profiles that detail a life not spent climbing the corporate ladder, such as the Japan-born, 18th generation Pure Land Buddhist priest who, later in life, studied in Switzerland and returned to Los Angeles as a Jungian analyst.

For all the richness of L.A. Times’ obituaries, many, many lives are unremarked upon. Prices for death notices start at $105 for five lines and go up from there. It’s a very white crowd one reads about, with just a sprinkling of Black people and Japanese-Americans. Latinos show up mostly when the Sheriffs benevolent society posts a notice about one of their own.

No, the obituary section is neither democratic nor truly representative of our community. Given that death is the most universal of all life experiences, isn’t this a most ironic shortcoming?